-
Physical Layout: The company occupies a single floor or a building with a linear layout. Offices and workstations are arranged in a line or a loop along a corridor.
-
Cost-effectiveness: Bus topology is relatively inexpensive to set up compared to other topologies like star or mesh. For a medium-sized company with budget constraints, this could be a favorable option.
-
Ease of Installation: Since the company is of medium size, the installation of a bus network wouldn't be overly complex. A single cable (the backbone) runs along the corridor, connecting all the workstations and departments.
-
Centralized Management: With a bus network, administration and management are centralized. It's easier for the IT department to monitor and troubleshoot network issues since all devices are connected to a single backbone cable.
-
Suitable Traffic Volume: In a medium-sized company, the network traffic might not be too heavy to cause significant congestion on a bus network. As long as the data transmission requirements are within the capacity of the network, it should function effectively.
-
Limited Expansion: While a bus network can accommodate moderate growth, it might become challenging to expand extensively without encountering issues like signal degradation or increased collisions on the network as more devices are added.
-
Departmental Connectivity: Each department can have its segment of the network connected to the main backbone. This allows for departmental autonomy while still being part of the larger company network.
-
Simple Network Architecture: Bus topology offers a straightforward network architecture, making it easy for employees to understand and work with. This simplicity can be advantageous in a medium-sized company where IT resources might be limited.
Overall, in this scenario of a medium-sized company with a linear physical layout, moderate network traffic, and budget considerations, a bus topology could provide a cost-effective and manageable solution for networking needs.
